This is the fifth installment of a five-post series about Dial M for Murder.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Update: In 2019, Warner Bros. released Dial M for Murder in 3-D on Blu-Ray, making it possible to watch this groundbreaking film at home in tight 3-D resolution that Hitchcock himself may not have enjoyed. The continuity errors discussed here are pulled from that edition and timestamped as follows:
13:38: A Chinese figurine faces outward 90 degrees from the wall. Its shadow is directly behind it.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Update: In 2019, Warner Bros. released Dial M for Murder in 3-D on Blu-Ray, making it possible to watch this groundbreaking film at home in tight 3-D resolution that Hitchcock himself may not have enjoyed. The continuity errors discussed here are pulled from that edition and timestamped as follows:
13:38: A Chinese figurine faces outward 90 degrees from the wall. Its shadow is directly behind it.
13:48: The shadow behind the figurine moves to its right.
14:20 The figurine has been turned away from the wall at an acute angle, and faces the camera directly.
Throughout this scene and concomitant with the changes in the figurine's disposition, Tony Wendice' pocket kerchief switches back and forth between flat and squarish to slightly rumpled. It would thus appear that parts of this scene were filmed on at least two separate occasions.
And it does. As in many Hitchcock movies, especially the tennis-themed Strangers on a Train, of which Dial M could almost be a sequel, doubles abound. There are the two jade lamps, two Wedgewood vases and a photo of Tony holding a pair of tennis rackets. Though it didn't make the final design, Hitch's notes also called for objects on the mantelpiece to be "visually doubled in number by the wall mirror behind them." There is the ornate pair of wooden chairs that resemble the chairs Johnnie gave to Lina in Suspicion. Tony's repeated whipping-shut of the curtains — an apparent continuity error (or is it?) — and the repeated high-angle shots tracing and retracing the steps of the crime all add to the film's uncanny atmosphere whose doubling and repetition, as Freud wrote, "force upon us the idea of something fateful and inescapable when otherwise we should have spoken only of 'chance.'"
This uncanny feeling is of a piece with the film's 3D experience itself, which Hitch used to help conjure up the feeling that the audience had been mystically transported into the film.
There's one piece in particular that merits special attention. But first, I haven't yet finished setting the stage. One of Dial M's primary themes has to do with watchfulness. Tony, as the mastermind behind the murder plot, must remain on the alert and on his toes throughout the movie. Yet, he is superseded by even more alert watchmen.
Tony acted in secret — or so he thought. But there was, it can be said, a watcher right inside his home, carefully hand picked by the director himself. The figurine of a Chinese woman (above) stands like an inscrutable sentinel, a partner in vigilance with the English bobby that patrols the street outside their home. She appears in dozens of shots, from every angle. In what may be a continuity error, but which is creepy nonetheless, the statuette seems to turn its head to follow the action, facing the audience head-on. I believe this is deliberate: from Blackmail to Psycho, Hitch's artwork often looks straight into the camera, to uncanny fourth-wall-breaking effect. Even more interestingly, this supposed "error" actually happens twice in the movie. Tony thought he was working in secret, but this Oriental statuette is a silent, unblinking witness to his committed devilry.
Though Dial M for Murder remains popular — and for good reason — it was not Hitch's most satisfying project. Years later, he claimed that he'd phoned his performance in, but that was just a canard from an old Cockney who couldn't resist a bad pun. The fact is, Hitch devoted his usual meticulous preplanning and research to the film, making sure that the Margot's hanging judge was wearing the appropriate powdered wig and instructing a remote crew to record London's traffic sounds, where another director might settle for stock street noise. He also said that he “had the floor [outside the apartment] made of real tiles so as to get the sound of the footsteps.” Though almost all of Hitch's films are models of cinematographic perfectionism, Dial M is uniquely masterful; each shot is a perfectly composed work of art. Yet, for all that, it is so fluidly shot and edited and the acting so natural — Ray Milland's suave performance gave Cary Grant a run for his money — that it goes down like a snifter of fine brandy — the good stuff. Wherever he went, Alfred Hitchcock was the smartest man in the room. People regularly called him a genius. In his more modest moments, perhaps he replied to such a charge as Tony did: “Not really, I've just had time to think things out, to put myself in your position.”
Hitch also acquired one valuable prize from the film: this was his first venture with Grace Kelly, whom he subsequently transformed into a movie star in Rear Window and To Catch a Thief, before she was scooped into the clouds and rechristened Princess Grace of Monaco. Sadly, under circumstances eerily reminiscent of scenes from the latter film, in 1982 she died in a car accident on the cliffside roads above Monte Carlo. I've been searching for her ever since.
Alfred Hitchcock's films have a peculiarly enchanted quality. It's a world where an ordinary glass of milk can become a harbinger of death, a portrait painting may stare you down and a statue might perform an interpretive dance.
The Wendices' upscale-bourgeois art collection runs a tastefully eclectic gamut between the classical and the exotic. Coffee table books about Da Vinci, Bellini and the French Impressionists lie casually about. Their well-appointed liquor stock ranges from special occasion brandy to "an indifferent Port." A Modern Primitive painting of a church inflects their home with the suggestion of religiosity. A taste for the exotic is hinted at by the abundance of Asian or Asian-inspired art objects, lamps and other furnishings, some of which may have been acquired during their travels in the Far East, where they encountered a "dreamy" Maharaja who owns "four Rolls Royces and enough jewels to sink a battleship when all he wants to do is bed women." Mixed in with personal photographs and as-yet disorganized press clippings, one senses that there's a story behind all these art objects. Perhaps they even browsed the bazaar in Morocco. Taken as a whole, their interest in Oriental exoticism and Christian religious art introduces a mystical element into an otherwise upscale bourgeois living space, creating a zone where the uncanny and magic can happen.
The figurine in Richard Hannay's hallway in The 39 Steps all but sounds the alarm that an intruder has broken in.
That knack for imbuing ordinary props with extraordinary qualities served him well with Dial M for Murder, whose plot twists depend on such commonplace objects as telephones and keys. In fact, it was almost a necessity.
For an auteur used to allowing his films many months' gestation, Hitchcock practically shot Dial M on the fly. Given a few scant weeks to assemble cast and crew, he had to settle for only minor adjustments in adapting Frederick Knott's hit play for the screen. Shooting covered a mere 36 days. On the plus side, he had basically one set to design and decorate: a single-bedroom flat in West London's tony Maida Vale district, occupied by Tony and Margot Wendice (Ray Milland and Grace Kelly). Citing "shocking taste" to his friend and one-time business partner Sydney Bernstein, he elbowed the set decorator George James Hopkins out of his way and took over that aspect of the production. A 1954 press release drawled that "because he is a man of taste and culture, Hitchcock hand-picked many of the props, including an original [lesbian artist] Rosa Bonheur oil painting, long hidden in Warners’ property gallery, and a pair of valuable Wedgewood vases." Donald Spoto adds that the director ordered "Staffordshire figurines for the mantel." (For the record, two vases sit on the mantel, along with an array of tennis trophies. The figurine mentioned by Spoto appears to have moved to a side table by the door, only to move again of its own volition during the film, as discussed below.)Birds flit through almost every one of Hitchcock's films, always hinting at danger or evil. In this case, thanks to the Asian-themed vases, a bird seems to swoop (kinda sorta) toward Margot as she buckles under the weight of her private guilt and of the false accusations aimed at her.
The Wendices' upscale-bourgeois art collection runs a tastefully eclectic gamut between the classical and the exotic. Coffee table books about Da Vinci, Bellini and the French Impressionists lie casually about. Their well-appointed liquor stock ranges from special occasion brandy to "an indifferent Port." A Modern Primitive painting of a church inflects their home with the suggestion of religiosity. A taste for the exotic is hinted at by the abundance of Asian or Asian-inspired art objects, lamps and other furnishings, some of which may have been acquired during their travels in the Far East, where they encountered a "dreamy" Maharaja who owns "four Rolls Royces and enough jewels to sink a battleship when all he wants to do is bed women." Mixed in with personal photographs and as-yet disorganized press clippings, one senses that there's a story behind all these art objects. Perhaps they even browsed the bazaar in Morocco. Taken as a whole, their interest in Oriental exoticism and Christian religious art introduces a mystical element into an otherwise upscale bourgeois living space, creating a zone where the uncanny and magic can happen.
And it does. As in many Hitchcock movies, especially the tennis-themed Strangers on a Train, of which Dial M could almost be a sequel, doubles abound. There are the two jade lamps, two Wedgewood vases and a photo of Tony holding a pair of tennis rackets. Though it didn't make the final design, Hitch's notes also called for objects on the mantelpiece to be "visually doubled in number by the wall mirror behind them." There is the ornate pair of wooden chairs that resemble the chairs Johnnie gave to Lina in Suspicion. Tony's repeated whipping-shut of the curtains — an apparent continuity error (or is it?) — and the repeated high-angle shots tracing and retracing the steps of the crime all add to the film's uncanny atmosphere whose doubling and repetition, as Freud wrote, "force upon us the idea of something fateful and inescapable when otherwise we should have spoken only of 'chance.'"
This uncanny feeling is of a piece with the film's 3D experience itself, which Hitch used to help conjure up the feeling that the audience had been mystically transported into the film.
There's one piece in particular that merits special attention. But first, I haven't yet finished setting the stage. One of Dial M's primary themes has to do with watchfulness. Tony, as the mastermind behind the murder plot, must remain on the alert and on his toes throughout the movie. Yet, he is superseded by even more alert watchmen.
Watchmen abound in this film, which opens with a view of a cop stationed right outside the couple's home.
Nothing gets by Chief Inspector Hubbard (John Williams, in a reprise of his role on Broadway). As a bookend to the opening shot, Dial M for Murder closes with one last look at the film's Chief Observer.
Tony acted in secret — or so he thought. But there was, it can be said, a watcher right inside his home, carefully hand picked by the director himself. The figurine of a Chinese woman (above) stands like an inscrutable sentinel, a partner in vigilance with the English bobby that patrols the street outside their home. She appears in dozens of shots, from every angle. In what may be a continuity error, but which is creepy nonetheless, the statuette seems to turn its head to follow the action, facing the audience head-on. I believe this is deliberate: from Blackmail to Psycho, Hitch's artwork often looks straight into the camera, to uncanny fourth-wall-breaking effect. Even more interestingly, this supposed "error" actually happens twice in the movie. Tony thought he was working in secret, but this Oriental statuette is a silent, unblinking witness to his committed devilry.
"The world needs a lot of watching." So says detective Jack Graham says at the end of Shadow of a Doubt. Vigilance is the key to stopping the Uncle Charlies and Tony Wendices of this world from getting out of hand. Luckily, there are those who, like the inspector, are willing to work above the rules (“Highly irregular, I know!”) in order to serve justice. Ironically, the film's closing lines are delivered by the villain, who is mixing cocktails: “I suppose you're still on duty, inspector?” – a nod, not only to Chief Inspector Hubbard of the film, but to an eternal Inspector whose justice always prevails in the long run. That figurine is a surrogate for, eyes on the ground, for that Chief Justice.
Though Dial M for Murder remains popular — and for good reason — it was not Hitch's most satisfying project. Years later, he claimed that he'd phoned his performance in, but that was just a canard from an old Cockney who couldn't resist a bad pun. The fact is, Hitch devoted his usual meticulous preplanning and research to the film, making sure that the Margot's hanging judge was wearing the appropriate powdered wig and instructing a remote crew to record London's traffic sounds, where another director might settle for stock street noise. He also said that he “had the floor [outside the apartment] made of real tiles so as to get the sound of the footsteps.” Though almost all of Hitch's films are models of cinematographic perfectionism, Dial M is uniquely masterful; each shot is a perfectly composed work of art. Yet, for all that, it is so fluidly shot and edited and the acting so natural — Ray Milland's suave performance gave Cary Grant a run for his money — that it goes down like a snifter of fine brandy — the good stuff. Wherever he went, Alfred Hitchcock was the smartest man in the room. People regularly called him a genius. In his more modest moments, perhaps he replied to such a charge as Tony did: “Not really, I've just had time to think things out, to put myself in your position.”
Hitch also acquired one valuable prize from the film: this was his first venture with Grace Kelly, whom he subsequently transformed into a movie star in Rear Window and To Catch a Thief, before she was scooped into the clouds and rechristened Princess Grace of Monaco. Sadly, under circumstances eerily reminiscent of scenes from the latter film, in 1982 she died in a car accident on the cliffside roads above Monte Carlo. I've been searching for her ever since.
Comments
Be sure to let me know what you think!
-Joel
I don't know if this is the place to discuss, but there's an aspect of Dial M which has never sat well with me; I can't figure it out. It is: when the police find/examine the stocking which had been around Margot's neck, they come to the conclusion it was Margot's because "the heel had been darned with silk thread which didn't quite match the stocking" and they subsequently said to Margot "you have a reel of that exact same silk in your work basket". What I don't understand is, from a story-telling point of view, what does it matter if the silk matched the stocking or not? The incriminating evidence is that Margot possessed a reel of silk which matched that which had been used to darn the stocking. The fact that she didn't have the correct colour, or couldn't be bothered matching the colour is irrelevant.
Dare I say it, but... to me, this element of the story seems badly written. Or, is it simply reflecting reality where sometimes we make mention of pointless details unnecessarily?
Or, alternatively, was it a 'dig' at the awkwardedness of male police/detectives when dealing with things feminine? It's the only part of Dial M which irritates me. Other than that I will never get over the excellent-ness of a pair of dressmaking scissors being used as a murder weapon!! The fact that the scissors are a feminine household tool and that Lesgate inadvertantly drove them into his back further by falling on them, is worryingly wonderful.
Hmmmm... Interesting question. My opinion is that Chief Inspector Hubbard was merely commenting that the htread stood out in contrast with the rest of the sock. A detail that would be hard to overlook. As such, it likelt appeared to the police as a possible clue to the origin of the stocking (similar to the bits of mud on Lesgate's shoe that matched that on the floor mat. This film is all about the details, where God or the Devil are both said to reside. So, while you're correct (I think) that it didn't matter whether the thread matched or not, I think the idea was to bring yet another detail into focus, and to demonstrate Hubbard's hyperawareness of such details.
Yes! That knife driving deeper into Lesgate's back gives me the heeby jeebies every time.